The Silencing of the Offenders

More and more, I see Blogs regarding sex offenders or written by sex offenders being taken off of different sites. Blogger looks to be one of them. Don't know for sure yet. I guess I will find out after I try and log in and my page is no longer here.

I understand the great 'noble' cause of the minority hate groups at trying to get sexual offenders off the Internet. CLUE: It cannot happen. The First Amendment *protects* speech. You guys know what the word means right. PROTECT. That is word you so happily use without merit or cause regarding all of the offenders that have been wronged by your draconian, unconstitutional laws. Yeah, that 'protect'..

I've done my time. Leave me alone.

People That Speak Untruths

This is from a blog on a Chicago paper I was reading through, it irked me. the site he shows completely bases itself off of ANCIENT datum collect by ABEL and Harlow in 2001. It it the report basically says that just like in the old days with mental patients, Sex Offenders should be lobotomized..

"Got to tell you, the numbers for repeat sexual offenders is all over the place, although for child molestation as I understand it, there is no counsling or treatment that works. I’ve seen programs where the talk to convicted child molesters that they CANNOT CONTROL THEIR IMPULSES. Now whether this is true or not you know some of them including rapist and other sorts of sexual offenders are going to do it again. Some of them we will never know about. I don’t want to include the 21 year old in love and vice versa the 17 year old with all of this.
As for the teacher regardless of thier age it is wrong.That teacher is in a position of a educator, not a fornicator. They are just as bad. For all of you people who say this law is bad, why not let them live next to you or better yet in your home. (I pray that there are no childred in your home).
I DO NOT WANT THESE ANIMALS NEAR MY CHILDRENS SCHOOLS OR ANY OTHER SCHOOLS!!!!! Now it may be true that they just find another way, at least this is a step in the right direction. Life in prison or execution for two time offenses should be in order. Please look at this web site it is chilling.http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pages/tell_others_the_facts.html

Comment from maerd
March 21, 2008, 10:54 am"





"Got to tell you, the numbers for repeat sexual offenders is all over the place, although for child molestation as I understand it, there is no counsling or treatment that works."

Care to name the "all over the place" sources you have? You are spreading lies and fear-mongering. I call you out on this MAERD!!, the re-offense rates for sexual offenders across the board are between 3.5 and 5% depending on studies put out by the Department of Justice.

Most sexual offenders DO have only one 'victim' and now with the inclusion of public nudity, peeing in public, teen sex, and teen picture swaps into the mix of reportable 'crimes' to be included in the registry the average of victims per offender will go FAR lower than 1.. sheesh, you people do not read accredited sources at all do you? Sex Offenders are the 2nd LEAST likely person's to re-offend. Murderer's are the lowest re-offenders out there, and well it is easy to see why in Texas.

FamilyWatchdog is a hate site against sexual offenders rating ALL sexual offenders as predators. ( Predators are the smallest grouping of sexual offenders, they are considered in the 3.5% that re-offend.) Which is in no way true and again is HATE AND FEAR MONGERING. Is the kid AND his girlfriend that were 14 and 13 BOTH predators? That is NOT a fallacy folks. under Adam Walsh's ACT, a 14 y/o boy and his 13 y/o girlfriend are both now happily on the sex offender registry FOR LIFE because they exchanged nude pictures with one another on their cell phones and got popped for child porn. There are MANY other cases between middle aged teens that are now part of the registry due to the WALSH ACT for LIFE!

Example of persons that are on the registry that will never be a threat with your child. Girls and guys arrested for peeing in public. Consenting adults that are caught with the blinds cracked during sex(sex in public), 19 y/o person in a consenting relation with their 17 or 16 y/o boyfriend or girlfriend, sex offenders who offend against adults.

As a question, can anyone really tell me what a pedophile is? can you?.. for all those thinking that the 30 year old guy having sexual thoughts, actual contact with your 14 to 17 year old is a pedophile, then sorry not only are you wrong you are stupid. a Pedophile is an adult that has thoughts, or commits actions against PRE-pubescent children. adults that have sexual thoughts of POST-pubescent are NORMAL. the illegal part of their actions is the touching of the Teen person. Currently today, we have some CHILDREN as young as 14 being labeled violent sexual offenders and pedophiles due to their consentual relations with SAME AGED boyfriend or girlfriend.


Myths about sex offenders
-- MYTH They are all non-cureable

--FACT With the proper treatment, sex offenders have a 96% chance of going on to become normal, mentally healthy people again, with offenders that did a non-violent crime against POST-pubescent teens being the most cureable.

-- MYTH Most Sex Offenders lurk in the shadows and grab up unsuspecting children when you are not around

-- FACT 90% of All sexual offenders come from INSIDE the home or are people who are related or are known to the victim.

--MYTH The typical Sexual Offender is a 40 year old loser living in his mothers basement, searching for victims on the web and trading child porn with other offenders

-- FACT 90% of sexual offenders are in the home or are family or friends. That means Dad, or Uncle BOB, or the nice man at the crosswalk, or their Cousin Sue.. The smoke and mirrors want you to believe the myth.

--FACT NO SEXUAL OFFENDER LAWS CAN PROTECT A CHILD LIVING WITH THE OFFENDER. Megan's Law, Jacob Wetterlings Law, Adam Walsh ACT have not and will not protect 90% of the future victims out there, because they only apply to 'STRANGER DANGER'. Stranger Danger is a myth as well, as only 10% of all sexual crimes are caused by people not known to the victims.

Sexual treatment DOES work, and unless you are a board certified therapist please don't open your unknowing mouths on this because you have no idea what you are talking about. Until you have been through treatment, and have witnessed the real change in the people there, then you are totally clueless and without merit in any "therapy doesn't work " garbage that you are spewing

Statistics released by the Department of Justice state the re-offense rates for all sexual offenders is between 3.5 and 5% total, with most reoffense occurring in the first 3 years of release from supervision. This rapidly declines thereafter until it is nominal at around year 7 out of supervision.

The Average reoffense rate for non-sexual crimes is 61% (burglery, car-jacking, shootings, domestic violence, violence against children, animal cruelty, etc).


Sex offenders are 4 times more likely to recommit a sexual offense than other non-sexual offenders. DUH! like that is a surprise guys, A Robber has the pre-disposition to ROB, not to sexually offend.

However, overall, a sexual offender is LESS likely to reoffend than all other non-sexual offenders (besides murderers) Only 4% of Sexual offenders that receive and complete treatment are likely to re-offend INSIDE of the already low 3.5 to 5% re-offense rate for sexual offenders total.

Stop believing the garbage hype that a few people are throwing out as fact. I am truly sorry for Adam Walsh and the things that happened to him, however it has NEVER BEEN PROVEN that a sex offender abducted ADAM. They have no idea who actually grabbed Adam that day in Sears, although they believe it could be a guy named O'Toole or Jeff Dahmer(which I find hard to believe as Dahmers MO was for teen boys).

The Adam Walsh Act is knee jerk legislation passed to make you FEEL safe, but does nothing to actually help you STAY SAFE. that is the job of the individual.

Currently there is great progress being made to lower the levels of re-offense even lower and hopefully it will go below the murder rate soon. Sexual offenses have been on the decline since 1996, and decreasing even fast since the year 2000. Treatment is a viable option for Sex Offenders, however the continued erosion of OUR rights is causing the truly worst of the worst to flee underground and to drop 'off the radar'. Do you feel safer NOW? By putting the Registries online, Law Enforcement is saying we cannot handle this work load, so here are the people to watch out for. If they cannot handle a web site full of people how will they ever keep the ones that drop off the scope in line? The restrictions are also causing issues where people become unsettled, and unstable in their environment.

It is proven that sex offenders that are in a home environment, with job stability, that they perform better and have an increased chance to never re-offend again.

So please READ real studies, not the bias of the people spewing hatred.

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/09/06/usdom16819.htm
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/rsorp94.htm

I've been replying

yes, I think the cycle has begun again. The one where I become so upset that I have to shout down anyone that spews their lies and un-educated information on the web. I get tired of the illegal rules they place upon us, and I feel the need to vent.

I was reading that soon, one of the states is going to attempt to keep us off the Internet entirely. Except for Work purposes is how their bill reads. Well Fuck you Mr and Ms. Representative. That violates SO many Rights, I cannot ever explain them all here. But what makes no sense, is they will happily draw up an amendment to inhibit THOSE rights first so that we cannot fight their ultimate Nazi rules.

reminds me of Thomas Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Maybe this is becoming our time. It is uncertain. American Government has slipped further and further toward fascism since Gov. Bush has occupied(1) the White House.

Are we not citizens? Do we no longer count? I say yes, we are and we do. 600K of us and counting. Although this is NOT a good number to become positive, it Does mean something. 600K citizens marked, 600K silenced, 600K wronged.

(1) Used in the meaning of military occupation, one of illegal intent.

What to do...

Here's a question to roll around for a while. if a sex offender is forced to move, can we ultimately charge the expense back to taxes? I mean, it is a forced governmental act. hmm that would be something interesting now wouldn't it...


The KIDS act, wonder how that one is going to play out.. I will give the state my blogger information, but not my professional information. That would violate the SOX404 Laws, and we wouldn't want to do that now would we.


Where is the DUI registry? O was reading a terrible story about a drunk who hit a limo head one containing the family from a recent wedding (2 hours prior). He injuried most of the people in the car, also killed the driver and sadly a 7 y/o little girl was decapitated... man, now that sucks! What wil this asshole get out of it? 5 years, but oh yeah, he has a problem, a disease.. please feel sorry for this murderer won't you.. Where is his registry? nowhere ti seems, and happily, he will be able to drive again real soon on appeal... I hope he dies a slow and painful death for what he did.. bastard.

Hey, The US takes more rights away!! whoo hoo.. They are now updating the registry with email addresses, and IM 'handles'.. there is talk that they want to put devices on my computers and computers of other S.O.'s so they can monitor us.. hmm, think that will survive the Supreme Court.. 20 years ago, I would say no way in hell.. But since the Sheeple believe everything their government says, it probably will pass... I think it is time to move somewhere else, I'll take my family, tax dollars, job, and intelligence with me. To Hell with this country, Home of The Free, Bah...

Life goes on

Just like the title says, life goes on. Same old crap in a new wrapper this week.

The big question is, just how sick is Warren Jeff's? Ok, ok, I understand that whole principle of the uber-right wing Mormon doctrine. The OLD Mormon doctrine that is. Go forth and populate the world and all that. Good Grief, What a freaking whack-job this guys is though. "Marrying" 11 y/o girls, spiritual unions.. bah, Warren your a sick "F" and I hope you die in prison. I have a degree in History, with emphasis on the Crusades era and I have yet to come across the Church ever saying it was ok to procreate with an un-developed child of 11. Yes, I will be the first to say that teens were married off from 14 and up during that time but even then 11 was considered a bit too young. That was a different time, but it wasn't that different. I DO take offense though that the Texas CPS and DOJ is attempting to tape this video onto their case against the folks in El Dorado though. But of course we all know that if One of them did it, ALL of them did it. I mean, look at me.. if one Sex Offender relapses, then of course we all will so keep them on a registry, send them to prison against the Constitution , opps I mean "Civilly" commit us...

We have gotten to see over the last few months though just how upstanding our appointed representatives are though haven't we. Now we see how these Drakonian laws are passed without anyone raising an eye.. It's all about their continued employment on the tax-payers dollar...

Take Care,
S.O.

Reviewing alternatives

Was just looking through a good number of findings, court information briefs, etc.

A good deal has gone into putting us into that group that cannot ever get away. not saying this is a good or bad thing looking at various people. If you are an active offender, or one that constantly tries to find ways to offend then I say hell yes, the laws should be tough on you. You should be watched, and checked as often as law officers can. My biggest issue is this, those of us that realized our crimes, and realized the impact that we had. The reformed offenders need some sort of recourse.

I know I know, those that hate us scream there is no such thing as a reformed offender, but I beg to differ, and the reports and statistics do not lie. Those of us that do not want to re-offend and harm others again have no recourse, even those that were dismissed from the system, and in any other instance would have been off on their merry ways as American citizens. This is troubling, not only for me personally, but to think about others and their situations is even more troubling.

My thoughts on this are varied, and to be honest rather jumbled up. As a father, I say that yes sxual offenders should be tracked. however I must also say that in fairness, those that were not convicted and were dismissed should be at least given a second chance.

I don;t know. it is all too troubling. We, the hated, are stuck in between unconstitutional items. Congress got around the constitutionality by making things Civil rather than Criminal, however there are criminal penalties if you violate your registration.. hmm, will have to think about that.

S.O.

Hate Groups

Hello and welcome to Friday.

Here's a subject that I really didn't want to talk about. However, after reading a few of their blogs/smears I think something needs to be said. Hate Groups, people that hate us, and supporters of such groups. Extremely dangerous mind-sets these. All comments are anti-SO, which can be understood, however the personal attacks on individuals are a bit over the top.

If some of the comments that are on their sites were geared towards others, they would more than likely be branded as terroristic threats at the least. I understand the fear of under-educated that people might have regarding sexual offenders. I can even see some of the hatred they have for those of us that have been through the system. I do not see however their exposure of the hate towards the families of the R.S.O. and their willingness to put themselves in danger of litigation should something harmful ever become of one of those family members..

Yeah Yeah, They are informing the public of people that are 'soft' on S.O.'s.. whatever floats their boats. However if it can be proven that someone actually acted on something written on their blogs, it could have significant ramifications for them. As as none of them are true journalists, they have lawsuit written all over them.

An accessory to a crime committed is anyone that had knowledge, planning, or actual commission of the crime. I hope they think about that when they decided to post to their personal blogs. Sort of like I think about things before I post to this one.

Until Next Time,
S.O.