Read this and understand..

Her body wracked by a rare cancer, 10-year-old Colby Curtin hung on to life so she could watch Up, the new Pixar animated feature.

Colby, diagnosed with a vascular tumor in 2005, had set her hopes on seeing the film when she saw a trailer for the movie in April. Her mother, Lisa Curtin, told the Orange County Register that her daughter's health took a turn for the worse afterwards, and by June, after the movie had opened, Colby was too ill to travel to a theater.

Reached by family friends and told of her wish, executives at the digital studio based in Emeryville, Calif. arranged to fly an employee with a DVD of the film to the girl's home in Huntington Beach on June 10, the newspaper reported. (Pixar did not comment.)

Colby, who could no longer see, listened to the film while her mother narrated the action. She died seven hours later.

A vigil is planned for Friday.

The level of sorrow I have right now ... I didn't put this so much to draw attention to the little girl, although I feel so sorry for her parents and family right now.

What I wanted you to see the beauty in what happened. They didn't have to do it. Children die everyday on this earth, unfortunately. The beauty in this is that someone listened. Someone at Pixar had enough heart and caring to send someone with the movie to allow this little person their last wish. Although not a very big thing in the scope of the world, that one act by Pixar was the most powerful thing for the girl. Kudos to Pixar, and may Colby rest in peace.

Shining example of motherhood!!

NEW YORK (WPIX) - A Queen's mom is accused of setting her six-year-old daughter on fire in a bizarre voodoo ritual that left the girl severely burned, authorities said.

Marie Lauradin, 29, a Haitian immigrant, apparently ignored little Frantzcia Saintil's screams as flames engulfed her body during the Feb 4. ritual, Queens District Attorney Richard Brown said. Frantizcia's grandmother, 70-year-old Sylvenie Thessier, reportedly came to her aide and extinguished the flames.

Instead of taking Frantzcia to the hospital, prosecutors say the pair, instead, sent the girl to bed, where she remained for a day before relatives begged them to take the girl to the hospital.

According to court papers, when Lauradin finally sought medical assistance for her daughter, doctors determined Frantzcia had suffered second and third-degree burns covering 25% of her body, including her face torso and legs.

Lauradin, who has been in the U.S for less than a year, was charged in Queens Criminal Court with assault and endangering the welfare of a child. If convicted, she faces up to 25 years behind bars.

Why again is she not being charged with ATTEMPTED MURDER?

According to police, Lauradin sprayed a circle of rum on the floor around her daughter and lit it on fire. She then poured some alcohol on the girl's head and pushed her into the ring of flames.

Initially, Lauradin reportedly told police she was boiling rice in a pot and accidentally spilled it on her daughter.

Her attorney Jeff Cohen said she is completely innocent of the allegations.

"This is my client's only child," Cohen told the New York Daily News. "My client would not hurt her."

WHAT!?! It was just stated that "Lauradin sprayed a circle of rum on the floor around her daughter and lit it on fire. She then poured some alcohol on the girl's head and pushed her into the ring of flames" That is NOT hurting her?!?!?!

Thessier is facing charges of reckless endangerment and endangering the welfare of a child. She faces up to seven years in jail.

Sorry but Grandma should be charged with the same as mom, plus accomplice to attempted murder. Good Grief

Wonderful. Yet one more in a string of parents that treat their children lessor than animals, yet we are 'MONSTERS'!?! Where is her ass listed on the registry?

Museum shooter also into child porn!?!

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The FBI says it found child pornography on a computer used by the man charged with the fatal shooting of a security guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum June 10.
Museum shooting suspect James von Brunn remains in a Washington hospital.

Museum shooting suspect James von Brunn remains in a Washington hospital.

In court documents filed Wednesday, an investigator says the pornography was found on a desktop computer during a search of an Annapolis, Maryland, apartment where 88-year old James von Brunn had been living for the past two years. The documents did not provide details about the pornography, but investigators requested permission to make a more extensive search of the computer and others found in von Brunn's home.

Von Brunn has been charged with the murder of museum security guard Stephen Johns. The white supremacist was shot in the face after two other security officers returned fire. He remains in a Washington hospital.

The FBI also searched a red Hyundai that law enforcement officials say von Brunn left double-parked in front of the museum right before the shooting. In separate documents also filed on Wednesday, investigators say they found 35 rounds of live ammunition for a .22 caliber rifle. Officials allege von Brunn used a .22 caliber rifle, which was found at the scene, to shoot Johns in the chest.

According to paperwork detailing the car search, investigators found business cards advertising a USS Liberty Web site that claims Israeli forces "suddenly and brutally" attacked the U.S. Navy vessel in international waters in 1967. Investigators also found business cards for von Brunn's own Web site, which hosts postings of white supremacist writings.

Among other items found in the car were a disabled parking permit, mouthwash, a salt shaker and a roll of quarters totaling $7.25.

Earlier this week investigators filed papers saying among the items discovered in von Brunn's apartment was a painting that appeared to depict Hitler and Jesus. They also found a .30-30 rifle, ammunition and a handwritten will.

Link here

Now isn't this a weird one.. Ok maybe this guy did have it, but currently we only have the word of the FBI, and lets face it folks their word isn't worth crap. If dude did have child porn, he will definitely lose the support of many people from the different organizations that promote his rhetoric. It would definitely be a win for the Government if that happened, because then he would be totally alone and have NO supporters. hmm, make you wonder huh.

if I were an enterprising Federal Agent and was told to find things that would totally isolate him from other groups, thus stripping him of support of larger organizations what could I do to make this happen... I could say he killed puppies and kittens.. but ofcourse that would only piss off PETA. So what label can I give him that would so totally alienate him that no one would defend him.. Sex Offender!!! and not only offender, but child molester!! that will get us some funding for the AWA program, and score some new positions from Congress so we can continue to fight neo-nazi skinhead child porn molesters.. Genius!!!

Personally, I hope the old bastard dies in prison. He killed a man for an ideology that mandates the injury and extermination of groups of people. That is something I cannot stomach. When are people going to understand that there is no such thing as 'RACE' .. There are different SKIN colors, but we are all the same RACE.. THE HUMAN RACE. Black White Asian Jew. All the same. Our blood is the same, our brain is the same, our internal workings are the same. if you take a heart of a black man, and place it in a white man, does that man instantly become Black?

No, he doesn't. People of the world need to make TOLERANCE the first priority in life. There are many ideals on this planet, many religions, many governments, but one thing is a constant. People are the same.

Excerpt: Is an unjust government better than no government at all?

I found this in browsing. It is a term paper excerpt that I found to be very telling. If your government is unjust, is that better than NO government at all?

My answer is this. It is my opinion that no government is above its people, and when a government stands to defraud its people of Liberty and Happiness granted them by the founders of that nation, then THAT government is unjust. Having an unjust government is far worse than no government at all, because eventually with no government majority rule will apply and a standard set rules or laws would be developed; However, an unjust government does not allow reasonable, majority rule to become the law of the land. An unjust government creates laws to keep themselves in power, and to disallow a peaceful overturning of the ruling class for that of the majority. This is why certain checks need to be put into place NOW. Solidly set term limits for all elected officials. The President currently have one, but Congress nor the Supreme Court have one for themselves. This needs to change. Representatives should be allowed 3 terms maximum, Senators should be allowed 6 terms maximum, giving both a 12 year maximum in which to pass law, and govern. The Supreme Court should not be a lifetime appointment. I feel that the supreme court should have no more than a 10 year seating on the bench in Washington.

Another thing that truly needs to change is the lifetime retirement given to those elected officials. Under no circumstances are we indebted to any elected official as a whole. Their reigns have been what has devastated us over the last 50 years.

Is an unjust government better than no government at all?

INTRO:
I do not agree that an unjust government is better than no government at all. Is it really logical to give your allegiance to a country whose government violates principles of fairness? I would have to agree with St. Augustine's famous quote, "an unjust law us no law at all," and therefore I think that an unjust government is no government at all.

CONTENTIONS:

a.) IF YOUR GOVERNMENT IS NOT LOYAL TO YOU THEN YOU DO NOT OWE IT YOUR ALLEGIANCE. I do feel that one has a moral responsibility to obey just laws, but I also feel that one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.
1 For example, America would still be just a province of Great Britain if it wasn't for our forefathers who stood up and rebelled against the laws which were clearly unjust.
2 If it was acceptable for them to rebel, then it is definitely acceptable now.
3 We are all under the assumption that the laws of the land are in place......

Using 'RAPE' as your defense

ST. LOUIS, MO (KTVI - FOX2now.com) - Two women are in police custody and accused of the murder. St. Louis investigators say the women are responsible for the beating death of a 26 year old man whose body was found in Forest Park. Willard Payne's body was found in the Kennedy Forest near a jogging trail Monday morning, just west of the St. Louis Zoo.

According to police, Payne met the women at a different location and asked them to smoke some marijuana with him. They eventually ended up in Forest Park. The women told police he then made some verbal advances towards the 25-year old female. She said no, so he allegedly started doing to same to her 20-year old companion.

It was later discovered by police that the women were apparently girlfriends, both of whom were larger than the victim. Reports indicate they started beating him. Payne ran and they then caught him and beat him to death, according to police.

Police caught the pair because they initially reported that the man tried to rape them. Police now say that's not the case. The names of the women will likely be released later Tuesday.

Link Here

Ok, Two women chase down this man, beat him to death, then claim he attempted to rape them?!?! I think it is fairly obvious that if they were big enough to beat him to death, that it would be near impossible for him to have forced a rape on them. How pathetic. Now the feminist groups will claim that the two are the 'real' victims because they were touched by their father, or the mailman, or some such stupidity and they will get either a light sentence or no sentence. When are we as a people going to stop blaming others for our own mental issues? These two are totally responsible for the murder, and they should get the needle for the crime they committed.

Convicted, but maybe not convicted SO in Court

LAS VEGAS -- A Las Vegas man accused of killing a 7-year-old girl in 1994 told a judge Wednesday morning that he is not guilty.

Gregory Wallen, a convicted sex offender, was ordered to be held without bail. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 1.

Wallen was arrested Monday in Pahrump, more than 15 years after the disappearance and slaying of Diana Hernandez. Her body was found in a trash bin near the Sandpiper Apartment complex at Flamingo Road and Maryland Parkway.

Detectives went through a list of registered sex offenders and matched Wallen’s name to the list of volunteers who helped search for Hernandez when she went missing. Police said Wallen’s DNA matched evidence found on the girl’s body.

Wallen had been accused of sexual assault in 1992, but had not been convicted and was not added to the registry until 1999.

Link Here

hmmm, Ok, I give up. If he was accused of sexual assault, was not convicted, then how again is he a 'Convicted Sex Offender'?? And the cops used the list of volunteers that searched for her as the list of suspects? This sounds really really fishy..

Labels tell it all...

Here's a story from Yahoo News. I don't have a problem with its outcome. This man did very bad things and deserved what he asked for, however the original headline was "Violent sex offender executed in Alabama". Yes, this man might have sexually violated someone, however he MURDERED 4 women. One bit of information states he sexually assaulted the last victim, but the information on the other three makes no mention as to if he sexually assaulted them or not. So factually, the headline states that a violent rapist was put to death, yes; However I believe a Headline of "Convicted Murderer put to death" would have been more truthful. The bias of media to grab the story and the reader is without shame when it comes to someone that has atleast one rape in their history.

WASHINGTON (AFP) – A 62-year-old man who begged the judge at his trial to have him put him to death for the rape and murder of a young woman has been executed by lethal injection in Alabama, prison officials said Friday.

Jack Trawick was executed late Thursday after having been convicted of the murder of a 21-year-old woman in October 1992.

Local media reported that he had confessed to the murders of three other young women. Having been sentenced several times in the past, his lawyer had asked in vain that Trawick should not be paroled until he had followed a program for sex offenders.

All appeals to halt his execution were dropped, although his lawyers continued to insist that he was suffering from a mental illness.

Trawick was the fifth person to be put to death by lethal injection this year in the state.

Link here