Contact Greg Abbott

Let this guy know to stop fucking with our families. He is putting all of them at risk!

Contacting the
Office of the Attorney General

By U.S. Mail:

Office of the Attorney General
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548

Physical Address:

Office of the Attorney General
300 W. 15th Street
Austin, TX 78701


By e-mail:

* Write to Attorney General Greg Abbott: greg.abbott@oag.state.tx.us

Texas AG wants to make ALL information public for Sex Offenders

AUSTIN — Not sure who your kid is chatting with online? If Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has his way, the state's public sex offender registry would include e-mail addresses and online names.

In what some are calling the toughest reporting proposals in the country, Abbott on Wednesday called for giving the public more information about the state's 53,000 registered sex offenders. Aiming to crack down on cyberpredators, Abbott hopes to expand the state sex offender registry to include e-mail addresses and Internet screen names.

“Parents could check all the e-mail addresses sent to and from their children's computer to find out if their children are communicating with a sex offender,” Abbott said.

He said his proposal would provide Texans with the “most comprehensive reporting requirements in the country” and would provide law enforcement, and ultimately the public, “with new and better tools to track and monitor sex offenders.”

The attorney general's plan would need the Legislature's approval; Abbott said he plans to meet with lawmakers in coming weeks.

Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, said he doesn't have any problems providing the public with more information on sex offenders and thinks Abbott's proposals have a good chance of passing the Legislature next year.

Texas leaders have enacted increasingly strict registration requirements for sex offenders. This year, the Texas sex offender registry expanded to include an offender's school or place of work.

Later this year, Texans will be able to sign up for e-mail alerts when an offender moves into a neighborhood. The public “can sign up to be notified about changes in a specific ZIP code or regarding a specific offender,” said Tom Vinger, a spokesman for the Department of Public Safety, which maintains the state registry.

Some question whether the focus on online predators creates a false sense of security.

Jill Levenson, a clinical social worker and professor of human services at Lynn University in Florida who has studied how sex crime policies affect sex crime rates, said children “are most often molested by people who are acquainted with the family, relatives and friends of the family, people who are trusted and use that trust to gain access.

“Parents certainly need to take precautions (regarding who their children are communicating with online) but in a way, all of this attention to Internet predators and stranger abductions and sexually motivated homicides takes away from important information we need to be giving parents, which is that children are much, much more likely to be abused by people (the family knows).”

As for whether tougher reporting requirements are effective in lowering the rate of sex crimes, Levenson said the studies she and others have done have been, at best, mixed.

“Overall, the totality of research so far looking at the impact of registration and notification with sex crime rates does not really indicate there is a strong deterrent or preventive effect,” Levenson said.

She said she knew of no public registry in the nation containing offenders' e-mail addresses or online names.

But Congress continues to pass stricter laws, as do states. Many registries, including the Texas registry, include at least some juveniles, their names, addresses and photos. Critics in Texas complain that the state registry includes anyone convicted of a sex crime, whether the offender had sex with a teen who was a few years younger or whether the offender repeatedly used force against a young child.

Bruce Siegel, 38, a convicted sex offender in the Dallas area, complained that Abbott's proposal targets all offenders, not just the ones he believes the public needs to be warned about. “Now you're asking police departments to monitor more, which spreads them pretty thin when they really need to ride herd on 10 or 30 percent of (all offenders), Siegel said. “It's going to cause more paperwork and a lot of wasted time.”

Abbott's proposal also would require offenders to report their cell phone numbers to law enforcement, though the numbers would not be made public.

It would also restrict some high-risk offenders from using the Internet at all.

This is absolute horse shit.

The continued eroding of my rights has to stop, and that starts today! Federal courts have already stated that email, and blog logins are protected under the first amendment. It is time to get rid of this ASSHOLE.

The day of whipping SO's is over. Vote this fucker out of office Texas, along with any other Perry-like asshole in office today. Write your present state elected official, tell them in no uncertain terms that any support for this measure will lose them you vote and the votes of the other 50,000 of us. It is time to take a stand.

Just saw this on CNN

Speaking of the upcoming Palin stumping, they have this 'live' shot of the arena, gym, or hotel room that she will be speaking in, and in the background is a woman with a sweatshirt.  I kid you not, it says  "Sarah, Alaska's Gift to the United States" ... 

She's joking right?  Gift?  Last I heard the pushing of a candidate that has a history of oppressing members of their home state, ethics issues, and no history performing a job of this magnitude would not in any way be called a 'Gift'...  My little Yorkshire Terrier leaves me 'Gifts' on the door mat every morning, and I am none too happy about those either.

Get a clue America.  Both parties are oppressing us, it is up to you to atleast use your head and choose the one that will oppress us LESS.

DNA shows shoddy police work AGAIN!

BALTIMORE -- A man convicted of taking part in a 1987 rape and murder has been ordered freed after DNA evidence caused the case against him to unravel.

Jayne Miller Reports

Baltimore prosecutors on Wednesday declined to retry 43-year-old James Owens for the stabbing and strangling death of 24-year-old Colleen Williar.

Owens and James Thompson -- Williar's neighbors -- were convicted in 1988 of committing what police and prosecutors described as a burglary that turned into a rape and murder. Police said Williar had been raped, strangled with a sock and stabbed repeatedly with a knife.

Owens was sentenced to life without parole.

But Owens' attorney, Stephen Mercer, filed a motion for a new trial nearly two years ago after a DNA test ruled out both Owens and Thompson as the men who had raped Williar.

The state ordered Owens to have a new trial, but on Wednesday city prosecutors chose to drop the case altogether because many of the witnesses had died and the rest of the evidence was gone.

"The knife we would have argued is the murder weapon, some of the hair at the scene, some of the clothing recovered at the time have all since been destroyed and lost to time," said Joseph Sviatko of the city state's attorney's office.

Mercer said his client was "overwhelmed" by the news that he will be a free man after serving 21 years behind bars.

"Mr. Owens is innocent. He didn't commit this crime. DNA evidence conclusively shows that, and it's disgraceful he's been in jail for 21 years," Mercer told 11 News.

He said a big question remains.

"Whoever committed this crime has gone free, has not been found, apprehended and prosecuted. The wrong people were prosecuted," Mercer said.

Mercer said Owens will be released by the end of the day.

Thompson testified when the two men originally went on trial, implicating himself and Owens in the crime. Defense lawyers said it was a false confession. He is also seeking a new trial.

Here we have another case of fire and forget justice.. 21 years this man spent in jail, wrongfully accused and sentenced. DNA cleared him.. and oh, the evidence is gone now.. hmm, methinks it was never there to begin with..

Keeping the Internet Devoid Act

Leave it to a lame duck president. Good Ole' G.W. signs the act into law, after the House voted it in during a late night session which was reportedly attended by only a handful of law-makers.

So what does this mean for the ex-Sex Offenders of the US? it now means that you are again saddled with more restriction that are not restrictions, that restrict your daily lives, put your wives, husbands, children in more danger of vigilante-ism.

Continue to contact the ACLU, continue to contact the Southern Law Center. This is a farce. Laws pushed on people that have completed sentencing is nothing more than exposte facto, and sooer or later we will get a judge that is not in the pocket of the lobbists to 'find' that fact.

Police Say Del City Toddler In 'Imminent Danger'

Police Say Del City Toddler In 'Imminent Danger'
Officers Say Boyd Quisenberry, Wife In Midst Of Divorce

DEL CITY, Okla. -- Del City police are looking for a 2-year-old girl, taken by her father, who has allegedly threatened to harm her.

Police issued a missing endangered juvenile alert Monday morning for Hannah Quisenberry Drennan. In the alert, officers wrote that the girl is "in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death."

Capt. Jody Suit said the girl's father, Boyd Quisenberry, took his daughter from their home at 4000 Thomas Drive, north of Interstate 40, at about 10 a.m.

The girl's mother jumped on top of the car to stop him, police said, but fell off. Quisenberry was last seen heading north along Interstate 35.

Police said the girl was wearing only a pull-up diaper.

Tell me again of Stranger Danger, John Walsh...


Anyone in the bordering states, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Kansas, New Mexico, or Colorado. If you see this twink, report his ass so this little girl can go home to her mom, please..

Why Parents decide to risk the lives and mental stability of children in messy divorces I will never know. i hope she is found safe.

Man drugs pie to sexually assault Teen

From CNN:

MACON COUNTY, N.C. -- A North Carolina man drugged a banana cream pie and served it to a visiting child who he then sexually assaulted while she was unconscious.

Douglas Charles LePage, 52, was convicted and sentenced to a minimum of 27 years and a maximum of 34 years in the Macon County Superior Court.

On Jan. 6, 2007, LePage and his wife invited the 14-year-old daughter of family friends to stay overnight at their home.

LePage prepared a dinner, including the banana cream pie that LePage had spiked with drugs.

LePage served the pie to the 14-year-old and his wife. Both of them were incapacitated by the drugs. While the child was unconscious, LePage sexually assaulted her.

When the girl's family picked her up the next day, they said she seemed disoriented, so they took her to a doctor. The medical exam revealed the sexual abuse and drugging.

The jury deliberated less than 40 minutes at the end of the four-day trial. LePage was found guilty of first-degree sexual assault of a child, taking indecent liberties with a child, delivery of a controlled substance to a minor and contaminating food with a controlled substance.

District Attorney Mike Bonfoey stated, “This case demonstrates that child molesters can appear anywhere in our community. This was a disturbingly disgusting event by a man who was trusted by the victim and her family. Sexual predators and child molesters should be in prison in order for our children and our communities to be kept safe.”

Another example of the lies that the media and Political Officials use to persecute sex offenders on the registry.

Here we see yet another Family member or Family friend that used their position of trust to sexually assault a teen-aged girl. If you have read this blog long, you will see the recurring line that it is the family or friend that is the largest danger to children or other family members as far as sexual assaults go. This is an example of a sexual predator folks. Go to the CNN story and take a good long look at his picture. Remember his face. Mr. LePage is the poster child for 93% of all sexual offenders. The ones that you know, the ones that you trust, the ones that have access to your wives and children. He is that offender. Now, look at him, and then compare him to the 19 year old, having sexual relations with a 16 year old girlfriend. I mean real consensual relations.

This guy spiked a pie with drugs, methodical, scheming. This is not some random dude picking up the wrong person in a bar, or a early 20's or late teen having relations with someone that is age appropriate. LePage drugged this teen to sexually assault her. But you will never hear about this difference, he's "just another sex offender"... Well he is not. He is part of the 93% of offenders that strike people that are related or that they know well. (which is obvious if the parents allowed the child to stay over). He is also part of a much smaller group of sexual offenders. Mr. LePage is a member of the predator class of offender. 3% of offenders are predatory, not all offenders.

Remember this when you see the news, and read about how all sex offenders are just like LePage. And remember that they are telling you a lie.